Arlo Pro 3 vs. Arlo Pro 2: Weighing the Pros and Cons
Introduction
Every time a maker introduces an update to a previous product, we tech enthusiasts and users rush to adopt the newest version. However, this isn't always the most sensible decision. In this article, we will delve into the differences and similarities between the Arlo Pro 3 and the Arlo Pro 2 security cameras. Whether the upgrades are worth the cost is something we will explore in detail.
Pixel and Visual Quality
One of the most significant differences between the Arlo Pro 3 and the Arlo Pro 2 lies in the camera resolution. The Pro 3 features a 2K HDR sensor capable of recording at 1440p, while the Pro 2 maxes out at 1080p HD resolution. This enhancement in pixel count translates to a clearer and more detailed image, making it particularly beneficial for those who require high-resolution recordings.
Field of View and Night Vision
When it comes to the field of view, the Pro 3 offers a broader 160-degree view, whereas the Pro 2 has a more modest 130 degrees. This larger field of view allows the Pro 3 to capture more of your property, such as your yard, garage, or living area, which can be crucial for surveillance purposes. Additionally, both cameras have night vision capabilities, but the Pro 3 takes the lead with its ability to capture full-color footage in low-light conditions, along with an integrated spotlight for better illumination.
Cost of Ownership
While the Arlo Pro 3 and Arlo Pro 2 share many similarities, the cost of ownership is a significant factor to consider. The Pro 3 is generally pricier than the Pro 2 at every package level. For instance, in the two-camera package, the difference can be as much as $180, and for the six-camera package, it can be up to $500. This substantial cost difference might deter some users from upgrading.
Storage and Cloud Services
Both cameras offer a variant of free distributed storage, but the differences in these versions are significant. The Pro 2 provides seven days of free online recording access for the lifetime of the system, which is convenient for basic needs. In contrast, the Pro 3 includes a three-month trial period for the Arlo Smart cloud service. After the trial, users will need to subscribe to a membership to continue accessing online storage. This can be an additional cost and might be a drawback for users who value convenience over upfront cost savings.
Conclusion
Deciding between the Arlo Pro 3 and Arlo Pro 2 comes down to weighing the pros and cons. While the Pro 3 offers superior pixel resolution and a broader field of view, along with advanced night vision features, it comes with a higher price tag. On the other hand, the Pro 2 strikes a balance between budget and performance. Users should consider their specific needs, budget, and the value they place on features like higher resolution and improved night vision before making a choice.