As Karl Marx once noted, history repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce. This article examines a striking parallel between historical conquest and a modern political threat, drawing insights from the perspectives of ancient and contemporary threats to regional stability.

Historical Conquest vs. Modern Political Threats

Centuries ago, the region witnessed the rise of the Allah Akbar fighters, who came from the East with full body armor to conquer it. However, recent events have seen fighters from the same direction arriving in starkly different attire, such as just wearing pajamas. This dramatic shift prompts an analysis of the underlying intentions and motivations of these groups.

Currently, the Turkish authorities led by Mr. Erdogan seem to lack the grandeur and imperialistic ambitions of their ancestors. Instead of focusing on internal issues such as inflation, which stands at 85% on paper but is more than 130% in reality, they threaten Greece with aggressive actions.

The Real Economic and Strategic Implications

One intriguing possibility is that Mr. Erdogan's threats aim to force Greece to allocate funds to expensive equipment that might never be used. For example, the cost of Rafales and F35s is staggering, with each Meteor missile reportedly costing around 1.5 million euros. However, it is worth noting that Turkey already has an advanced defense system, known as a 'dud' but actually a highly effective decoy. It is unlikely to be activated and its speed does not matter as it would quickly reach destruction.

Furthermore, the threats from Turkey highlight a critical need for Greece to prepare for any potential aggression. Historical experiences from 1940, where Greece lacked heavy equipment and faced the Italian invasion, serve as a reminder that any aggressor must be met with determined resistance. Just as the proverb 'ποιο νχτα περπατει λσπε και σκατ πατει' (Whoever walks in the night in mud and shit he will step to) indicates, threats should be met with resolve and preparedness.

Internal Reflections and Diplomatic Dialogues

It is also worth considering the personal and psychological state behind such aggressive and threatening behavior. The suggestion that Mr. Erdogan might be 'peeing in his bed' symbolizes a lack of control and serious internal issues. This could be a sign of sleepwalking or even a dreamer who imagines conquests while simultaneously walking through the dreams of others. Addressing these underlying issues could prevent such dangerous and unpredictable behavior.

In conclusion, the parallels between historical conquest and modern political threats highlight the need for a combination of internal reflection and strategic preparedness. The region would benefit from diplomatic dialogues focused on addressing economic and strategic issues rather than relying on aggressive posturing.