Narendra Modi's Petrol Price Hike and Political Blame Game

The ongoing debate over the 2012 petrol price hike, a sensitive topic in Indian politics, continues to spark disagreements. Critics claim that Narendra Modi unfairly blamed the Indian National Congress (INC) for the increase, using this as a political tool. However, others defend Modi's actions, suggesting that it might not have been a political decision but rather a reflection of international market conditions.

Criticism: A Case of Political Posturing

The rhetoric surrounding the 2012 petrol price hike has been met with fierce criticism, particularly from those who argue that it was a political blame game. One of the key points of contention is the suggestion that blame should be left to the Nehru family, who are often perceived as more responsible for economic matters. This stance implies that Modi, as the Prime Minister, should take the lead in resolving such issues rather than deflecting blame.

The phrase 'clueless now shameless' highlights the sense of deep disappointment among those who believe that Modi, who previously ran on a platform of accountability, is now unwilling to accept responsibility. Instead, he is accused of resorting to the same tactics of blame-shifting that previous governments employed. This behavior is seen as particularly egregious, given that the public entrusted him with the task of governance, expecting transparency and responsibility.

Defence of Modi: Economical Hikes and Political Convenience

Narendra Modi's defense of his actions is multifaceted. He maintains that he never blamed the INC for the petrol price hike and instead holds the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) responsible for the subsequent price increase. This rhetoric is based on the claim that the BJP-led government tripled the petrol and diesel prices. Modi's supporters argue that international oil prices were the real factor driving the hikes, not political games.

However, it is important to note that the BJP's propaganda did not solely focus on international oil prices. Instead, it also emphasized high taxes as a significant contributor to the cost of petrol and diesel. The BJP's strategy relied on both technically inaccurate claims and the strategic use of blame, often shifting responsibility to the incumbent government. One of the controversial claims was that Indian petrol prices were higher than in most countries, including Pakistan. This assertion was used to make the argument that subsidies were not a viable solution to reducing prices.

Broader Context: Political Alliances and Economic Policies

The argument that Modi and Manmohan Singh, representing the BJP and Congress respectively, are 'just 2 sides of the same coin' indicates a deeper contextual understanding of Indian politics. This view posits that both parties are often in collusion, despite their public disagreements. Whether it is a case of political posturing or genuine concern for economic policy, the impact on the Indian public remains the same.

Furthermore, there is a significant discussion about the relationship between international oil prices and domestic petrol prices. The claim that there is no way to delink the two suggests a complex interplay of global economic factors and national policies. While international prices are a critical determinant, domestic taxes and other levies also play a crucial role in the final cost to the consumer. This point is crucial in understanding the broader economic context of petrol pricing policies.

Finally, the contentious issue of petrol price increases remains a contentious topic. The recent hike of four rupees, considered unjustified, continues to spark outrage. This episode serves as a reminder of the deeply rooted tensions in Indian politics and the need for transparent and accountable governance.

In conclusion, the 2012 petrol price hike, as a political issue, continues to be a contentious topic, with varying interpretations and historical contexts. Whether it is a simple shift in blame or a complex interplay of economic and political factors, this episode raises important questions about leadership, accountability, and the responsibilities of the Prime Minister.