Overview of Political Divides in Modern America
The question of how to compare and address the political divide between the two major US political parties in 2017 versus previous decades is indeed a fascinating one. This discussion assumes that division is inherently a 'bad thing,' but we must recognize that healthy competition is a cornerstone of American democracy, as enshrined in our founding documents and celebrated through the self-correcting phenomenon that defines our beloved nation.
Healthy Competition and Americanism
A healthy political competition is quintessentially American. Our system of government is built on the idea of a two-party or even multi-party system, where differing views and factions compete and influence each other. This competition is necessary and required, as exemplified by the breakup of Ma Bell, a prime example of the consequences of monopolistic rule. To live under one-party rule would be a grave injustice to the fundamental principles of Americanism and democracy.
The Evolution of Political Factions
Political factions, as they have evolved from James Madison's writings in Federalist Paper 10, continue to be a part of the democratic process. Madison warned about the dangers of factions, particularly those driven by special interests or unbridled wealth, but he also acknowledged that their presence is almost inevitable. In modern times, these factions can be understood as political parties, special interest groups, and citizen-politicians of significant wealth.
Madison's Warnings for Modern Times
Madison's concerns about the instability caused by factional conflicts and the 'interested and overbearing majority' remain relevant today. When we consider the political landscape in 2017 and beyond, it becomes clear that the issue is not the party itself but rather the behaviors and actions of individual political figures and factions. For instance, the incoming president in 2017, Donald Trump, raised concerns about the potential for partisan separation exacerbated by a lack of civic passion and civil discourse.
The Current Political Landscape
Today, the political divide is more complicated and intense than ever. The fall of 2017 saw a markedly different political climate, characterized by rising economic, educational, social, ethical, and moral tensions. These tensions are expressed in various societal issues, from unabated racism and economic inequality to violent unrest, opioids, cyber-shaming, and an erosion of trust in media and politics. Additionally, the prolonged military engagement, educational debt crisis, aging population, and environmental stressors all contribute to the complex and multifaceted nature of the divide.
Addressing the Divide
The question of how to bridge this divide is crucial but often overshadowed by the urgent need to address these pressing issues. A mere bridge between parties is unlikely to address the root causes of the divide. Instead, the focus should be on electing candidates who embody genuine civic passion and the willingness to legislate based on conscience rather than financial interests. The political environment in 2018 and 2020 should be used to shock and awaken the incumbent pool of lawmakers with a surge of civic engagement and the election of courageous leaders.
Conclusion
While it is natural to strive for unity and harmony, it is equally important to recognize the benefits of healthy competition and opposition in a democratic society. The political divide in modern America is complex and multifaceted, but addressing the underlying issues of civic passion, civil discourse, and structural reforms will be key to bridging the gap. In doing so, we ensure that our democratic process remains robust and resilient, consistent with the ideals of self-correcting America.