Negotiating the Border: Why Mexico Should Fund the Wall

Negotiating the Border: Why Mexico Should Fund the Wall

For a long time, the United States has grappled with the problem of illegal immigration and drug trafficking from Mexico. Many believe that Mexico should have the financial responsibility to fix these issues by funding the border wall. However, the idea of Mexico funding the wall is not only a moral argument but also a practical one. In this article, we will explore the rationale behind why Mexico should be held accountable for these issues and what the consequences of not doing so might be.

The Historical Context

It's important to note that Mexico has a long history of involvement in illegal activities that impact the United States. This includes the millions of unauthorized immigrants who pass through Mexico on their way to the USA, the influx of illegal drugs into the country, and the deplorable working conditions that encourage illegal immigration.

Historically, liberal political leaders in Mexico have failed to address these issues effectively. Instead of enforcing laws that would control immigration and drug trafficking, they have allowed these crises to continue. This has resulted in a staggering $trillions in damage to the United States, not only in financial terms but also in human suffering.

The Controversial Idea: Mexico Fund the Wall

Interestingly, a recent proposal suggests that Mexico should not only take responsibility but also fund the construction of a border wall. Contrary to popular belief, Mexico is reportedly considering the idea of funding the wall, but with a twist—it will be called the 'Mexican Wall.' However, the goal is not to keep Americans in, but rather, to keep Americans out of Mexico. This concept has been further bolstered by discussions between Canada and Mexico, who are planning to build a 'Canadian Wall' for the same purpose.

The Cost and Alternative Solutions

Building a wall along the border is an extremely expensive proposition. The cost of each mile is estimated to be around $43 million, making the total cost of a 2,000-mile wall exceed $87 billion. In comparison, a cheaper solution might be to install simple markers or 'clotheslines' along the border. The cost of such a solution would be significantly lower, with estimates at about $100 per mile.

Potential Measures to Deter Illegal Activity

Other practical steps could be taken to reduce the burden on the United States. For instance, placing crocodiles in the Rio Grande River could serve as an effective deterrent to those attempting to cross illegally. Additionally, enhancing border security with the assistance of the Mexican army could help to prevent drug traffickers from entering the country and keep illegal immigrants at bay.

Conclusion

Mexico's failure to address the issues related to illegal immigration and drug trafficking has resulted in significant damage to the United States. It is imperative that Mexico takes responsibility for these issues by contributing to the construction of a border wall and implementing stricter immigration and drug control measures. The cost of inaction could be catastrophic, both in terms of economic loss and human suffering.