Reflections on the Endurance of Democracy in the 21st Century

Thinking in absolutes is often a privilege reserved for intellectuals and a bane for the common populace. Human choices are inherently relative, not absolute. This includes the choice of governance, such as democracy.

Consider nature through the lens of a salt quarry. Salt and sea water are one, yet when salt crystals begin to form, they separate and become distinct. Similarly, in human societies, new populations (like migrants) can change the social fabric drastically. When a large number of migrants join a local populace, they bring their distinct identities which can act as a catalyst for societal change. This catalyst can either grow and dominate or eventually dissipate over time.

Historically, older societies often featured high levels of segregation, with each tribe maintaining its unique identity. These identities led to the rise of powerful figures, often referred to as kings or leaders. These individuals held significant power because their peers chose to entrust them with authority, believing that this arrangement would protect their shared identity from external threats. This phenomenon is a classic example of a group accepting temporary hardships for a perceived greater good.

Democracy is another method for distributing power and fostering a collective identity. However, if segregation becomes too high, democracy can appear as a poor choice. This is a recurring pattern in various regions. For instance, ancient Rome saw a stark divide between master and slave societies, while modern-day dictators often engage in sectarian politics to maintain control.

Some regions, like the United States, have experienced a more dynamic balance. American democracy has faced significant challenges, notably during the Trump administration.onald Trump's tenure, particularly his approach to race and identity, has been transformative. He has personally challenged the notion of white racial entitlement, making it impractical for many Americans. In essence, he has acted as a thorn in the side of latent and explicit racial bias, causing it to be more visibly recognized and critiqued.

Compared to the United States, European countries present different challenges. While the same principles of diversity and integration apply, there is a greater reluctance to confront certain issues head-on. Leaders like Silvio Berlusconi and the lingering reverence for royal authority demonstrate a more passive approach to change. This mindset hinders the necessary reforms required for inclusive growth.

It is important to recognize that the challenges and responses to these issues are situation-dependent and context-specific. Each country and region has its unique set of circumstances that influence how governance and societal dynamics evolve. The path to a more integrated and equitable society is complex and requires ongoing effort from leaders and citizens alike.