The Archbishop of Canterbury’s Silence: Meghann’s Claims on a Private Union

Meghann phoned the Archbishop of Canterbury to clarify a point about her and Harry's union, but her statement was met with silence. Was the Archbishop simply respecting privacy, or was there more to his reaction?

Legal Requirements for Marriages

A legal marriage requires two witnesses, making a minimum of five people present. This fact alone contradicts Meghan's claim of the union being a private one, with just three people present. Given her previous experience with marriage, it seems unlikely she would have overlooked this detail.

When the Archbishop commented that his recollection was “different,” it's clear that his perspective diverges from Meghan's. In her statement, she may have been referring to a private union, which could have been interpreted metaphorically rather than literally.

Interpreting the Archbishop’s Silence

There are several reasons the Archbishop might choose to remain silent:

Privacy and Respect for Personal Choices: Public figures often have private matters they prefer to keep out of the limelight. The Archbishop might be respecting that privacy. Ambiguity of the Statement: Meghan's comment could be seen as metaphorical rather than a literal claim. The Archbishop might feel there is no need to respond if the statement does not pertain to official church functions. Clerical Discretion: The Archbishop, as a leader of the Church of England, has discretion in addressing matters that do not directly involve official church teachings or ceremonies. Avoiding Controversy: Engaging in a public discussion about the private lives of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex could lead to media scrutiny and backlash. By remaining silent, the Archbishop may be trying to avoid controversy. Focus on Official Duties: The Archbishop might prioritize his role in official church matters and ceremonies, thus preferring not to comment on personal declarations made by individuals outside of formal church contexts.

Ultimately, the Archbishop's silence could be a combination of these factors, reflecting a desire to maintain professionalism while respecting the couples' personal choices.

Contradictory Claims and Legal Formalities

Another perspective from the same individual who made the initial claim provides an alternative viewpoint. It suggests that:

Laws and official documentation, such as the signing of a register, are what make a marriage legal. Any private promises made during a church ceremony do not have legal standing without proper documentation. Therefore, any suggestion of a private union bypassing legal requirements would be incorrect.

This account emphasizes that a legal marriage cannot be established without the necessary legal formalities and documentation, further reinforcing the need for a public, legal ceremony.

Based on the Archbishop's lack of response and the contradictory claims, it is clear that the matter remains unresolved and open to interpretation.