The Dilemma of Longevity and Wealth: Choose Wisely
When faced with the decision between living a million years and being poor, or five years and being super rich, the answer seems clear. The question of longevity versus wealth is a philosophical conundrum often debated in discussions about life, happiness, and fulfillment.
Million Years and Poverty: An Illusion of Endurance
The idea of living a million years, whether rich or poor, might sound appealing to those who believe in eternal life. However, an extended lifespan, no matter how long, can bring about numerous challenges and hardships.
Firstly, the sheer span of time would lead to significant boredom. The human experience is inherently patterned; after a period, familiar surroundings and daily activities become tedious. Additionally, the accumulation of many losses and perceived wrongful acts would weigh heavily on the mind.
“Imagine enduring the pain, suffering, and hardships of living for a million years. You would experience countless losses of loved ones, numerous hard feelings, and moments where you feel so bored that you just want to die but you can’t,”
Such a prolonged existence could indeed become a living nightmare, making it a less attractive option.
Five Years and Super Wealth: A Life of Splendor
On the other hand, living for just five years and being super rich offers an alternative that seems more appealing. In this option, a person can enjoy the wealth and experiences that come with financial stability and freedom. An abundance of material goods, travel, and personal achievements can fill five years with joy and excitement.
“The problem is, once you get adapted to that awesome lifestyle, it would be a short time more before you die. And knowing when you’ll die would make life much more scary.”
While the end is inevitable, the journey through those five years can be filled with luxurious experiences and memorable moments.
Richness and Poverty: Relative Terms
It is important to note that the terms "rich" and "poor" are relative. They can vary widely depending on cultural, social, and individual perspectives. For example, consider the Hmong people in Laos, who survive on plant roots and live in constant fear of military persecution due to their past assistance to the CIA. For them, the five years of super richness would seem like a magical opportunity to escape their dire circumstances.
“In such cases, the concept of euthanasia becomes relevant. The Hmong, who have no money and live in constant danger, might prefer a short life with as much richness and joy as possible rather than an indefinite, impoverished existence.”
Excess and Real Misery
However, it is also argued that excess often leads to real misery. A life filled with too much wealth and material possessions can create new anxieties and pressures. On the other hand, a simpler, more basic life—free from excesses—can lead to greater contentment and satisfaction.
“Personally, I have experienced both extremes—having too much money and not enough. Living on the basics, while perhaps less glamorous, is more grounded and in touch with reality, as long as you avoid substance abuse.”
Overall, the choice between longevity and wealth is deeply personal and dependent on one’s values, priorities, and life experiences. It is a decision that reflects one's philosophy on the essence of a fulfilling life.