The Douma Lie: Exposing the Alleged Chemical Weapon Attack and the Western Media's Role

Scrutinizing the allegations surrounding the chemical weapon attack in Douma in Syria, it becomes evident that the claims are riddled with inconsistencies and dubious evidence. This article will dissect the allegations, scrutinize the role of the Western media, and delve into the findings of investigations conducted by seasoned journalists and experts. We will also question the credibility of the claims and reveal the truth behind the fabricated narratives.

Was Assad Gained Anything From Using Chemical Weapons?

Proponents of the theory that the Syrian government used chemical weapons in Douma often argue that Assad would have gained significant advantages. However, a closer examination reveals that this was not the case. The lack of tangible gains supports the idea that the allegations are baseless. It has been repeatedly stated that the alleged attack was likely staged by terrorists for propaganda and to frame the Syrian government.

The Disproved Allegations in Douma

The so-called chemical attack in Douma was thoroughly debunked by international inspectors and journalists. One of the most compelling arguments against the allegations comes from Seymour Hersh, the prominent Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist who exposed the My Lai Massacre during the Vietnam War and the Abu Ghraib torture scandal in Iraq.

Hersh traced the earlier attack in Damascus to a NATO member, highlighting the inconsistencies and biases associated with the initial reports. His revelations provide a critical perspective that challenges the established narratives perpetuated by the Western media.

Fake Evidence and Misleading Claims

The fabrication of evidence and the dissemination of misleading claims are pervasive in the narrative surrounding the Douma chemical attack. Several key points deserve scrutiny:

False Staging of Evidence: It appears that White Helmets Productions, an organization known for its advocacy work, attempted to stage a chemical attack for media consumption. However, the hasty and unprofessional nature of the staged evidence raises significant doubts about its authenticity. Problems with the Tank Evidence: The alleged chlorine gas tanks, which were supposed to have been dropped from above and landed intact, failed to demonstrate any destruction upon impact. Moreover, the presence of undamaged chickens in the vicinity of the alleged attack site further undermines the credibility of the claims. Physical Inconsistencies: When inspecting the supposed evidence, it was observed that the balloons, used to simulate gas release, were dragged up the stairs, leaving visible paint tracks that matched the color of the tanks. This physical traceability suggests that the evidence might have been fabricated.

Furthermore, the videos purportedly showing gas tanks being thrown from above were analyzed by experts who concluded that they were impossible to throw with the intended weight and integrity. The absence of any forensic evidence pointing to chemical warfare further refutes the claims of a chemical attack in Douma.

The Inconsistencies in the Testimonies

The testimonies provided by those claiming to have been affected by the chemical attack also fail to stand up to scrutiny. Seventeen Syrians, including children, came forward to provide their identities and answer questions at a briefing in The Hague. However, the lack of curiosity among Western authorities and reporters during these testimonies is telling.

Instead of cross-checking the claims on the ground or probing for details, the Western government representatives dismissed the briefing as a masquerade and boycotted it. The majority of present journalists were more interested in questions regarding compensation and rewards for the participants rather than the alleged chemical attack itself. This suggests a lack of genuine interest in the truth behind the allegations.

The Role of the Western Media

The Western media's role in perpetuating these falsehoods is significant. Investigative journalists like Seymour Hersh have exposed the inconsistencies and biases in the narrative. While these journalists have provided critical counter-narratives, the mainstream media often chooses to ignore or marginalize their findings.

The consistent support for claims without concrete evidence and the reluctance to question their validity suggest a bias in the Western media. This media bias, rooted in a desire to maintain certain geopolitical alignments, has enabled the spread of fake news and misinformation.

Conclusion

The allegations surrounding the chemical attack in Douma lack substantial evidence and appear to be part of a carefully crafted misinformation campaign. The role of the Western media in amplifying these claims without proper scrutiny further exacerbates the issue. It is essential to approach such claims with skepticism and rely on verified information from credible sources to distinguish fact from fiction.