The Inadequacies of Early 1500-1 BCE Gene Studies on Ancient Egyptian Rulers

For centuries, genetic studies have provided insights into the genealogies of ancient civilizations. However, when it comes to ancient Egyptian rulers from 1500-1 BCE, these studies often fall short of offering a comprehensive and accurate picture of the genetic makeup of native Ancient Egyptians. This inadequacy is not purposely designed; rather, it is materially inadequate due to the limitations of the organic artifacts available for study.

Material Inadequacies in Early Genetic Studies

Organic artifacts from any ancient period typically suffer from degradation due to the passage of time. Even the most well-preserved specimens are often severely degraded over millennia. Degradated samples are at least better than nothing, but they still present significant challenges for genetic analysis. The bio-artefacts that have survived often underwent various chemical treatments, such as salting, embalming, greasing, cooking, and other preservation methods. These processes can compromise the quality of DNA, making precise genetic profiling difficult.

Historical Context and Genetic Research

Ancient Egypt is an umbrella term for a civilization that spans over 4000 years, from the late 31st century BC to the 4th century BC. Throughout this extensive period, various ethnicities and ruling classes continuously governed the region. This diversity complicates the interpretation of genetic studies, as even the most authoritative research cannot definitively determine the genetic makeup of all native Egyptians with complete accuracy.

Reasons for Discrepancies and False Claims

Many individuals, both academics and laypeople, make various claims based on genetic studies, whether they have a sound basis or not. Despite the potential for misinformation, there are few consequences for those promoting such claims. This freedom to promote narratives, informed or otherwise, means that the accuracy of the claims is largely irrelevant as long as they serve the individual's purpose. The real issue lies in whether the audience is sufficiently informed to evaluate the validity of these claims.

Political and Ideological Implications

The need for Ancient Kemet (ancient Egypt) to be portrayed as non-Black is evident in the skewed narratives promoted by some. These claims are driven by a desire to uphold the myths of white supremacy, which, when revealed, collapse into a narrative of “egoist bullshit.” Ancient Kemet, with its many contributions to early human civilization, precedes numerous European civilizations. If Ancient Egypt is deemed Black, it contradicts the falsehoods perpetuated by white supremacists. Consequently, attempts to position Egypt as ruled by white-skinned Eurasians are illogical and historically inaccurate.

To illustrate, white supremacists in the field of ancient anthropology study need Kemet to be white or ruled by white-skinned Eurasians for their ideologies to hold ground. However, such claims are hilariously false and defy historical evidence.