The Truth About Medieval European Shields: Debunking the Pentagon Myth

While enthusiasts often imagine a wide range of different shapes for medieval European shields, one particular question frequently arises: did medieval European shields truly exist in pentagon shape? The answer, based on extensive historical evidence and analysis, is a definitive no. Let's delve into the reality behind these misconceptions and explore the shapes that were actually used by warriors of yesteryear.

Common Medieval Shield Shapes

Medieval European shields were predominantly oval or round. These designs were optimized for both protection and practicality on the battlefield. Crafted from light yet tough wood, these shields were heavily covered with leather, which not only provided an extra layer of protection but also helped in absorbing the impact of blows. Additionally, metallic mountings lined the rims to offer further reinforcement.

Round Shields as the Norm

In fact, round shields were so prevalent that even many Hollywood movies depict them as the iconic shape of the period. These shields featured a hole in the center, which was bridged by a hand grip on the inside and a shield boss on the outside. Examples such as the Norman Cavalry and the straightforward round designs used in various eras confirm the primacy of this shape.

The Absence of Pentagon-Shaped Shields

Despite the allure of shaping mythology for dramatic effect, there is no historical record of pentagon-shaped shields being used in medieval Europe. A shield tester arguing that he has never seen or heard of a five-sided shield and that the traditional shape is more akin to a reversed triangle offers a compelling perspective. This observation is not merely anecdotal; it is supported by centuries of scholarly research and archaeological findings.

Misinformation and Fictitious Examples

Some might equate certain heraldic devices or artistry with pentagon-shaped shields, but these should be understood as artistic representations rather than functional artifacts. Heraldic shields, for instance, were created for decorative purposes and were not intended for combat. Similarly, the depiction of such shapes in movies or books should be seen as fictional elements rather than accurate representations of historical shield designs.

It is important to note that while shields took on various shapes, the most practical and widely used were those that could deflect blows effectively. Curvature was a vital feature, as flat surfaces were more easily penetrated. This understanding of the practical needs of shield design explains why pentagon-shaped shields were not part of the arsenal of medieval warriors.

Conclusion

The misconception of pentagon-shaped shields as a real historical phenomenon is one of many examples that highlight the gulf between popular imagination and real historical accuracy. When exploring the rich tapestry of medieval European warfare, it is essential to rely on a foundation of well-documented facts and verified historical evidence. By doing so, we can gain a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the kinds of shields that protected knights and infantrymen across Europe long ago.