The Vatican’s Walls vs. National Borders: A Doctrine of Disconnected Critiques

Introduction

The ongoing debate surrounding immigration policy, particularly within the United States, has often invoked the critique of the Catholic Church and its leader, the Pope, especially regarding border security measures. However, juxtaposing the Vatican's security measures with the need for robust border policies can be seen as a misguided and disconnected critique. This article aims to clarify these points and provide a more holistic understanding of the issues at hand.

Vatican Walls: A Matter of Security

The walls surrounding the Vatican City serve as a historical and symbolic defense mechanism. Built in the 800s, these walls were designed to protect the Pope and the papal state from barbarian invasions. Today, these walls are open to the public and serve both as a barrier and a point of interest. The gates are not locked, and visitors can enter freely. Detailed historical accounts reveal that the primary purpose of these walls was to ensure the safety and protection of the Pope and the city-state. Critics often forget or ignore the substantial vandalism and security threats that exist in a bustling urban environment like Rome.

Building the Wall and Border Security

When discussing border security in the United States, it is essential to acknowledge the complexities involved, including industrial property, wildlife migration, national park lands, and other significant factors. Simply comparing the Vatican's security measures to the United States' border policies is akin to comparing apples to oranges. The Vatican, being a city-state of 0.17 square miles, does not face the same challenges.

The Papacy and Modern Immigration Policy

Pope Francis has indeed taken a more humanistic approach to his role, focusing on social justice and human rights. This stance does not mean he does not support the need for border security. The Vatican is not immune to security threats. In fact, it often faces cybersecurity risks, vandalism, and other security issues. It is important to note that while the Pope promotes compassionate policies, he also understands the necessity of protecting national borders.

Historical Context and Criticism

The criticism towards the Pope for his stance on border security is often rooted in historical misrepresentations and selective memory. Over the past 55 years, the Catholic Church has faced significant challenges, including infiltration by individuals with opposing ideologies. This is a distressing fact, and it is crucial to acknowledge the church's weakened position in today's global landscape.

Conclusion

The comparison between the Vatican's walls and border security policies is simplistic and lacking in context. Understanding the unique circumstances of each situation is crucial. The Vatican's walls serve a specific and historical purpose, while border security measures in the United States involve a complex set of challenges. The Pope's humanistic approach does not negate the need for strict border security. It is time to engage in a more nuanced and informed debate on these critical issues.